Left 4 dead 2 video và nội dung nổi bật

In gaming since L4D2, tín đồ campaigns have even pressured devs khổng lồ release entirely new endings.

Kyle Orland - May 1, 2021 1:00 pm UTC


*

The following piece, originally published in late 2009, looks bachồng at that year"s somewhat quixotic attempted boycott of Left 4 Dead 2—và how that effort eventually fell apart. Flawed as it was, that movement would serve as a precursor lớn more frequent attempts by organized tín đồ communities trying to bring change in the game industry. The most famous example might be the outcry around the conclusion of Mass Effect 3 in 2012, where the developers actually released a downloadable patch changing the conclusion of a franchise-sweeping narrative sầu to placate vocal fans.This report và over a dozen more are collected in Save Point, a new collection from Ars Technica Senior Gaming Editor Kyle Orl&. The book looks baông xã on Clip games as they were between 2003 to lớn 2011, a sometimes-uncomfortable "awkward adolescence" period where the industry did its best khổng lồ grow up with the young audience that had grown up with games as their entertainment of choice through the "70s, "80s, và "90s. The pieces collected in the book analyze how games were learning from their past và influencing the future, report on some of gaming"s growing & myriad sub-communities, & examine how the business of selling & kinh doanh games was evolving alongside the explosive sầu growth of the Internet.

You watching: Left 4 dead 2 video và nội dung nổi bật

Save sầu Point is available exclusively as part of the Spring Getaway Games Bundle through May 13.

In general, gamers aren"t very effective at organizing khổng lồ effect change in the game industry. Sure, there are hundreds of online petitions demanding everything from a Full House game to lớn a generalized end to game hacking, but the vast majority fail to lớn garner much attention or tư vấn. Even well-organized và well-publicized efforts, like those seeking LAN support in StarCraft 2 or further support for the Earthbound games are met with official responses ranging from polite refusal lớn teasing hints & rarely with real change.

But this year, many gamers took a different tack to protest what they saw as a betrayal of a publisher"s past promises. Mere hours after Valve announced the planned November release of Left 4 Dead 2 (L4D2) at June"s Electronic Entertainment Expo, a group calling for an L4D2 boycott popped up on Valve"s Steam user community. The group"s first public message asked a simple question that would come to define its cause: "Where"s all the nội dung và the updates you promised for , Valve?"

*

The somewhat impolitic biệu tượng công ty for the boycott group.
By casting their disagreement in the size of a boycott, the tens of thousands of gamers who joined the L4D2 boycott group immediately mix themselves apart from the Internet petitioners who came before them. A petition is just a polite request for someone lớn change their mind, if they would, please. A boycott is a statement of collective sầu action—a way for a group to flex its economic power khổng lồ force change. It"s a way for a community to effectively put its money where its mouth is và demand that its case be heard. It"s a cause that brings up images of patriotic movements, civil rights struggles, international incidents, and other events more momentous than an argument over the release timing for a đoạn Clip game sequel.

See more: Kmplayer Mới Nhất 2016 - Tải Kmplayer Full Mới Nhất 2021

Now that Left 4 Dead 2 is actually available for sale, can those who took part in the boycott argue they achieved their goals? Was this boycott more effective sầu than any of the other failed grassroots petition efforts undertaken by gamers over the years? Did Valve change its plans khổng lồ gain the approval of the masses, or did it effectively pacify the Internet throngs with nothing more than a couple of plane tickets and a hotel reservation?

Advertisement

In other words, was the boycott successful?

Well, it depends on what you mean by "successful."

An explosive start

From the start, the Left 4 Dead 2 boycott effort succeeded at attracting a lot of attention, at least. Thanks lớn mostly bemused coverage from gaming websites during the high-traffic E3 news window, 5,000 Steam users signed up for the group in its first three days of existence. "We gave sầu interviews to just about anybody toàn thân that asked," said Walking_Target, the pseudonymous founder of the L4D2 boycott group, in an interview for this piece. " responded lớn questions from our members và benefited from a lot of press exposure, even if a lot of it was negative. In the end, it was so successful , because this was a group made mostly of Valve fans who just wanted khổng lồ let Valve know that they expected more for L4D."

But getting people to cliông xã a button và sign up for an Internet prodemo group is simple. Getting them to lớn actually organize for effective sầu action is the tough part. Luckily for the group, Walking_Target seemingly realized this early on in the process. "To simply talk about the release of L4D2 and the issues we have with it are not enough," he wrote in a June 4 message lớn the group. "It is only half the battle. A storm of words without action is no more potent in its ability khổng lồ move our cause forward or make our goals happen. It is time we took some action as a community."

But first they had lớn figure out what those goals were. So, after a quiông chồng poll to lớn gauge the group"s "official concerns," the boycotters put together a 325-word manifeskhổng lồ that laid out their commitments, beliefs, and requests for Valve sầu.

Crucially, the manifeskhổng lồ started off by recognizing Valve"s need to lớn make money off its games và acknowledged that "judgment cannot be passed on the quality of Left 4 Dead 2 until its release." But those concessions didn"t dampen the impact of the group"s demands: "That Valve sầu honor its commitment to release ongoing periodic nội dung for Left 4 Dead;” that "Left 4 Dead 2 not be released as a stand-alone, full-priced sequel but as either a không lấy phí update lớn Left 4 Dead or an expansion with full compatibility with basic Left 4 Dead owners;" & "that Left 4 Dead owners be given discounts for Left 4 Dead 2, should it be released as premium content."

Advertisement

While the requested changes lớn the price & format of the sequel were important, it was the idea that Valve was somehow abandoning the original Left 4 Dead that animated the most passion in the boycotters. "Left 4 Dead has not yet received the tư vấn and content which Valve has repeatedly stated will be delivered," the manifeslớn argued.


It was an argument that had some justification behind it. In an October 2008 interview with VideoGamer.com before the original game"s release, Valve sầu Co-Founder và Managing Director Gabe Newell compared Left 4 Dead khổng lồ Valve"s own Team Fortress 2 (TF2), a multiplayer staple that has received frequent không tính tiền updates since its late-2007 release. Newell said that these updates had proved key to lớn the continued success of TF2"s online community & that Left 4 Dead would receive the same kind of continued attention. "We"ll vày the same thing with Left 4 Dead where we"ll have the initial release & then we"ll release more movies, more characters, more weapons, unlockables, achievements, because that"s the way you continue lớn grow a community over time," he said.

See more: Hướng Dẫn Đánh Số Trang Trong Word Đơn Giản Và Nhanh Nhất, Hướng Dẫn 2 Cách Đánh Số Trang Word


When Valve sầu announced Left 4 Dead 2 in early June, this was beginning to lớn look like a bit of an empty promise. By that point, the company had only released a collection of small tweaks và new modes as a Left 4 Dead "Survival Pack" và had provided a beta version of a Software Development Kit for eager modders. These tepid additions didn"t come cthất bại khổng lồ matching the robust updates being provided for an ongoing game like Team Fortress 2.

The depth of Valve"s support for TF2 may have sầu actually phối a precedent that has come back khổng lồ bite Valve sầu during the slow rollout of new Left 4 Dead nội dung. "I vày think that a bit of the issue falls on Valve sầu for training us for such good free nội dung," said Brent Copel&, host of The Safe House, a Left 4 Dead-focused podcast. "I almost think if L4D came from a different company that there wouldn"t be as big of an issue."

Walking_Target agreed that Valve"s handling of TF2 led people to think of it as a different kind of company. "It made a reputation for Valve as a company that supports their games. It was probably a bad idea to lớn compare support for L4D to lớn TF2 so early on, though."